File bugreport at redhat (upstream) bugzilla? 10.5.2013 6.54 "Andrew Reis" <andy at dbmsinc.com> kirjoitti: > > -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf > Of Andrew Reis > Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 3:33 PM > To: centos at centos.org > Cc: jim at dbmsinc.com > Subject: [CentOS] Parted Bug? in C 5.9 > > I'm receiving the following error when trying to repartition and reformat a > USB flash drive via parted using a simple script. The bug follows: > > > > /sbin/parted -s /dev/sdb mkpart primary fat32 > > Backtrace has 14 calls on stack: > > 14: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_assert+0x3b) [0x10af3b] > > 13: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x146194] > > 12: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x146f4d] > > 11: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x1483c7] > > 10: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x1103e7] > > 9: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_disk_add_partition+0x295) [0x112e65] > > 8: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a2c3] > > 7: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a505] > > 6: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_disk_new+0xa3) [0x113c23] > > 5: /sbin/parted [0x804e2ef] > > 4: /sbin/parted(non_interactive_mode+0x7c) [0x8052c9c] > > 3: /sbin/parted(main+0x58) [0x8050f58] > > 2: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc) [0x94cebc] > > 1: /sbin/parted [0x804b521] > > You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do: > > Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data. > > Help us to fix this bug by doing the following: > > Check whether the bug has already been fixed by checking > > the last version of GNU Parted that you can find at: > > http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/ > > Please check this version prior to bug reporting. > > If this has not been fixed yet or if you don't know how to check, > > please visit the GNU Parted website: > > http://www.gnu.org/software/parted > > for further information. > > Your report should contain the version of this release (1.8.1) > > along with the error message below, the output of > > parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print > > and additional information about your setup you consider important. > > Assertion (head_size <= 63) at dos.c:623 in function > probe_partition_for_geom() > > failed. > > Backtrace has 15 calls on stack: > > 15: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_assert+0x3b) [0x10af3b] > > 14: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x146194] > > 13: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x146f4d] > > 12: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x1483c7] > > 11: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x1103e7] > > 10: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_disk_add_partition+0x295) [0x112e65] > > 9: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a2c3] > > 8: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a505] > > 7: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a7a5] > > 6: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_disk_new+0xa3) [0x113c23] > > 5: /sbin/parted [0x804e2ef] > > 4: /sbin/parted(non_interactive_mode+0x7c) [0x8052c9c] > > 3: /sbin/parted(main+0x58) [0x8050f58] > > 2: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc) [0x94cebc] > > 1: /sbin/parted [0x804b521] > > You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do: > > Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data. > > Help us to fix this bug by doing the following: > > Check whether the bug has already been fixed by checking > > the last version of GNU Parted that you can find at: > > http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/ > > Please check this version prior to bug reporting. > > If this has not been fixed yet or if you don't know how to check, > > please visit the GNU Parted website: > > http://www.gnu.org/software/parted > > for further information. > > Your report should contain the version of this release (1.8.1) > > along with the error message below, the output of > > parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print > > and additional information about your setup you consider important. > > Assertion (head_size <= 63) at dos.c:623 in function > probe_partition_for_geom() > > failed. > > > > Output of parted /dev/sdb unit co print unit s print: > > > > parted /dev/sdb unit co print unit s print > > Backtrace has 14 calls on stack: > > 14: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_assert+0x3b) [0x10af3b] > > 13: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x146194] > > 12: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x146f4d] > > 11: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x1483c7] > > 10: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x1103e7] > > 9: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_disk_add_partition+0x295) [0x112e65] > > 8: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a2c3] > > 7: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0 [0x14a505] > > 6: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_disk_new+0xa3) [0x113c23] > > 5: parted [0x804d21b] > > 4: parted(non_interactive_mode+0x7c) [0x8052c9c] > > 3: parted(main+0x58) [0x8050f58] > > 2: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc) [0x94cebc] > > 1: parted [0x804b521] > > You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do: > > Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data. > > Help us to fix this bug by doing the following: > > Check whether the bug has already been fixed by checking > > the last version of GNU Parted that you can find at: > > http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parted/ > > Please check this version prior to bug reporting. > > If this has not been fixed yet or if you don't know how to check, > > please visit the GNU Parted website: > > http://www.gnu.org/software/parted > > for further information. > > Your report should contain the version of this release (1.8.1) > > along with the error message below, the output of > > parted DEVICE unit co print unit s print > > and additional information about your setup you consider important. > > Assertion (head_size <= 63) at dos.c:623 in function > probe_partition_for_geom() > > failed. > > parted: invalid token: unit > > Ignore/Cancel? > > > > Model: Kingston DT 100 G2 (scsi) > > Disk /dev/sdb: 3927MB > > Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B > > Partition Table: msdos > > > > Number Start End Size Type File system Flags > > 1 4129kB 3927MB 3923MB primary fat32 boot, lba > > > > > > > > Anyone have any ideas? > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Does anyone have any suggestions about this? > > Andrew Reis > Networking/Windows Support > DBMS Inc. > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >