On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote: >> > I know that it's binary compatible and that the software that works for > RHEL will work for CentOS. What I mean by "supported" is a company who > will see the host OS is CentOS and not throw up their hands and say > "sorry, not supported!". > > My fear is that, a year from now, something will go wrong and the > company we choose won't help us. We're not a backup company and we have > no interest in becoming one, either. So we want to find a company to > partner with who will see "CentOS" and still help us. So in short, this > is a political, not technical question. If it is somebody else's money, and that somebody else wants support, why aren't you pointing them to RHEL in the first place? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com