On 11/14/2013 12:52 PM, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > I do agree that for the amount of drives he has, raid10 seems to > be the way to go. That said, what about raid6? every random write has to read/modify/write 3 drives on raid6. raid6 rebuilds are painfully slow. raid6 write performance degradation when a drive is down is awful. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast