On 09/24/2013 03:55 PM, Lists wrote: > On 09/19/2013 08:26 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: >> It works for what it does. And I'm completely prepared to freeze it as far >> as software goes. I was just curious what may have happened after that >> particular version of the kernel, and whether there's something else I can >> do, or call it done, slap a red sticker on it that read, "DON'T EVER >> UPGRADE ANYMORE" and call it done. >> > For what it's worth, we have a single-core P3 running the latest > Centos6/32 without issue. I realize that from a processing power stand > point my SIP phone is probably faster, but like Ashley, it does a job > and very well at that. (network monitor) > > [root at edison ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo > processor : 0 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 6 > model : 7 > model name : Pentium III (Katmai) > stepping : 3 > cpu MHz : 498.456 > cache size : 512 KB > fdiv_bug : no > hlt_bug : no > f00f_bug : no > coma_bug : no > fpu : yes > fpu_exception : yes > cpuid level : 2 > wp : yes > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 mtrr pge mca cmov > pse36 mmx fxsr sse up > bogomips : 996.91 > clflush size : 32 > cache_alignment : 32 > address sizes : 36 bits physical, 32 bits virtual > power management: > > [root at edison ~]# cat /proc/version > Linux version 2.6.32-358.18.1.el6.i686 > (mockbuild at c6b10.bsys.dev.centos.org) (gcc version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red > Hat 4.4.7-3) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Wed Aug 28 14:27:42 UTC 2013 > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > What is with people these days? Why if something works but it is old do people want to say OMG you need new hardware? -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark at netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com