[CentOS] htdocs on NFS share / any pitfalls?

[Les Mikesell]

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Leon Fauster
<leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> What kind of throughput and latency are you talking about here?   NFS
>> shouldn't add that much overhead to reads compared to disk head
>> latency and if you enable client caching  might be considerably
>> faster.   If you are writing over NFS you don't get the same options,
>> though and sync mounts are going to be slow.
>
>
>
> bonded (just for failover) interface with speed: 1000Mb/s duplex: Full
>
> ping gives me a round-trip echo packet with ~ 0.139 ms
>
> writes ~ 57,9 MB/s (dd test)
> reads ~ 59,7 MB/s (uncached), 3,9 GB/s (cached) (dd test)

How do those compare to the native disk speed on your NFS server (if
it is a host where you can access the disks locally)?   And does the
dd speed improve it you use a very large block size?

-- 
   Les Mikesell
     lesmikesell at gmail.com