[CentOS] htdocs on NFS share / any pitfalls?
Carl T. Miller
carl at carltm.comTue Oct 22 23:01:30 UTC 2013
- Previous message: [CentOS] htdocs on NFS share / any pitfalls?
- Next message: [CentOS] htdocs on NFS share / any pitfalls?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leon Fauster wrote: > i have a new setup where the htdocs directory for the webserver > is located on a nfs share. Client has cachefilesd configured. > Compared to the old setup (htdocs directory is on the local disk) > the performance is not so gratifying. The disk is "faster" compared > to the ethernet link but the cache should at least compensate this > a bit. Do they exist more pitfalls for such configurations? If I needed to serve files from an nfs share, I'd use rsync to pull down a local copy of the files to the webserver. This would give you the benefits of using the nfs location without the network latency. c
- Previous message: [CentOS] htdocs on NFS share / any pitfalls?
- Next message: [CentOS] htdocs on NFS share / any pitfalls?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list