[CentOS] biosdevname
Phil Wyett
aura.yoda at gmail.com
Fri Apr 11 15:39:43 UTC 2014
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 11:28 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 04/11/2014 11:21 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> > On 03/20/2014 12:04 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Anybody else run into problems with biosdevname .0.5..0-2 changing names
> >> from p2p1 to em1 when upgrading from biosdevname 0.4.1-3?
> >>
> >> Darn!
> >> I thought biosdevname was to keep the names the same!!
> >>
> >>
> > Update - I filed a bug report and got this response:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078974
> >
> > Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch at redhat.com> changed:
> >
> > What |Removed |Added
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Status|NEW |CLOSED
> > CC| |fdeutsch at redhat.com
> > Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
> > Last Closed| |2014-04-11 08:51:05
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Comment #2 from Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch at redhat.com> ---
> >
> >
> > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1058170 ***
> >
> > Which is OK, but when I try to view the bug 1058170 I get
> >
> I guess I can't send an image - but it said:
> *You are not authorized to access bug 1058170.*
> even if I am logged into bugzilla.
> >
> > even after logging in. What up with that!!!
> >
> >
>
>
I can view the report without issue via link:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058170
The only comment i.e. #1 says:
Fabian Deutsch 2014-01-27 02:13:59 EST
Cloned this to biosdevname because it the device names changed between
6.4 and 6.5.
Regards
Phil
--
Phil Wyett
{
GNU Linux User and Developer
Leigh GNU Linux User Group (http://leigh.lug.org.uk)
IRC: philwyett
Twitter: philwyett and leigh_lug
}
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20140411/149b220c/attachment.sig>
More information about the CentOS
mailing list