[CentOS] Difference between ruby193 CentOS SCL and ruby193 softwarecollections.org SCL

[Johnny Hughes]

On 04/03/2014 09:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 04/03/2014 09:28 AM, Filip Bartmann wrote:
>>  
>> I've found that in https://softwarecollections.org/repos/rhscl/ruby193/epel-6-x86_64/ is passenger included but in http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/SCL/x86_64/ruby193/ is not.
>> What is the differences between this two repos?
>>  
> The CentOS software collections ... and if using mine, use the released
> version not the testing version ... see this announcement:
>
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-February/020164.html
>
> The CentOS Software Collections are rebuilds of the Sources released here:
>
> http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/RHSCL/
>
> As to what the softwarecollections.org repo is and how it will be
> maintained, someone else (from that group) will need to answer that and
> how they will maintain that repo.
>
> It looks like every package listed in this documentation:
>
> http://red.ht/OfhNRA
>
> Is also here:
>
> https://softwarecollections.org/repos/rhscl/
>
> But, as to how it is being maintained, I'm not sure.
>

Closing the door on this post ...

SoftwareCollections.org is the home for many software collections for
Fedora, RHEL, and CentOS.  There are many SCLs there (including the RHEL
1.1 beta packages).  I would recommend that people use these SCLs on CentOS.

It seems that the packages there are currently not signed .. for people
who don't want to use them because of that, we will produce the RHEL 1.1
SCL packages when they release.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20140416/88c108fc/attachment.sig>