[CentOS] Why are hplip and hpijs always so back dated?
Styma, Robert E (Robert)
robert.styma at alcatel-lucent.comWed Apr 30 22:15:25 UTC 2014
- Previous message: [CentOS] 3TB non-system disk reports wrong size on Centos 6 x86_64
- Next message: [CentOS] Why are hplip and hpijs always so back dated?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
My fully patched CentOS 6.5 system uses: hplip-common-3.12.4-4.el6_4.1.i686 hpijs-3.12.4-4.el6_4.1.i686 hplip-libs-3.12.4-4.el6_4.1.i686 My wife's printer becomes supported at 3.13.somethingOrOther and the current release is 3.14.something. Why are we so far behind? I realize that I can download the latest, uninstall the RPM versions and compile and build and install the source copy. If I was going to follow that route, I would prefer to build an rpm and install it normally. I have been looking on the Internet and not found anything to turn the release from HP into a binary RPM. (That does not mean it is not there.) I know it must be doable since there are rpm's in the repositories. My skill with RPM's is somewhat limited, but does anyone know of a set of instructions and a spec file that could be used to get started on this process? Thanks in Advance Bob, Phoenix, AZ,
- Previous message: [CentOS] 3TB non-system disk reports wrong size on Centos 6 x86_64
- Next message: [CentOS] Why are hplip and hpijs always so back dated?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list