On 04/07/2014 06:37 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote: > Is this legit? Anyone try this build? > It is legit in that it seems possible to build via the DevTool Set 1.0 ... and also DevTool Sets 2.0/2.1.: http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools-2/ There are custom patches in the source code that I have not completely validated and I have also not looked at the flash handling completely in the sources. I do plan to look at this code a bit more and make it build in mock and not manually out of the chroot ... so I can not currently vouch for it 100%, but it does seem on first blush to be legit. I do plan on doing some work with this after I get back home from ApacheCon (Denver, Colorado - 7 to 11 April 2014) and Red Hat Summit (San Francisco, CA - 13 to 18 April 2014) ... so likely in 2 weeks. Of course, if I have some free time at those places then I might get it done sooner. If someone out there wants to validate the source code in the meantime, feel free to do so and post here. Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20140407/d10cb866/attachment-0004.sig>