On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:27 AM, Adam King <kinga at sghs.org.uk> wrote: > Thanks :) > > Am 11.08.2014 um 18:43 schrieb Adam King: > > Can you explain why you'd use milter over spamassassin? Genuinely > interested as we could certainly get better spam filtering... > > just becaus eit is the only way where you can > *block and reject* spam instead still deliver > it with a special subject > > http://www.postfix.org/MILTER_README.html > > without a milter your only choices are: > > * deliver crap > * get a backscatter and get blacklisted > * drop messages while pretend you accepted them and go to jail > > "-r 6" = reject with a score of 6 and bigger > spamass-milter -p /run/spamass-milter/spamass-milter.sock -g sa-milt -r 6 > > Another alternative to milters is the postfix policy daemons. The best one to use for block and reject is policyd-weight. found here http://www.policyd-weight.org/ This gives spam a weight based on a number of factors. I setup to do this score <0 accept immediately score <10 greylist then verify sender, then spf, then spamassassin if not spf pass. score >10 reject immediately dave