Just my opinion but rpmforge was great for CentOS 5 then epel was better for 6.....I haven't tested 7 enough to know yet. Adam King IT Systems Administrator Skipton Girls High School 01756 707600 www.sghs.org.uk ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt" <matt.mailinglists at gmail.com> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Sent: Thursday, 14 August, 2014 5:08:33 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Instaling LAMP on CentOS 7.x So EPEL is preferred over rpmforge now days? In past to get clamav and some other packages seemed like I had to use rpmforge. On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Always Learning <centos at u62.u22.net> wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-08-14 at 11:26 -0400, John Plemons wrote: > >> Here is a link to enable the epel repo >> >> http://www.tecmint.com/how-to-enable-epel-repository-for-rhel-centos-6-5/ ( >> It was updated to include CentOS 7 ) > > This is probably a better link as it provides more choices, for example > > * EPEL 7 beta: x86_64, ppc64, sources > * EPEL 6: i386, x86_64, ppc64, sources > * EPEL 5: i386, x86_64, ppc, sources > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL > > > -- > Regards, > > Paul. > England, EU. > > Centos, Exim, Apache, Libre Office. > Linux is the future. Micro$oft is the past. > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS at centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos