On 12/02/2014 10:35 AM, Warren Young wrote: > We ship servers to remote sites, which are rarely staffed with techs familiar with Linux. We have them tell us the static IP configuration for the box before we ship it, then we set it up for them here and ship it out to the site, where they just plug it in, turn it on, and walk away. > > That’s the ideal, anyway. > > What often happens in reality is either: > > 1. They give us incorrect static IP info, so the box arrives and won’t connect to the Internet, which means we often have to arrange to get someone clueful on-site to fix it. > > 2. The site is in the middle of some major deployment, a small piece of which is our server, so the LAN isn’t ready, but they demand the box be shipped early anyway for some handwavy business reason. "No, we can’t tell you what static IP to use," they say. "Just configure it on-site," they say. Sigh. > > Since these systems have 2+ Ethernet ports and we really only need one in normal operations, we’ve taken to configuring the second one for DHCP, so that they can just move the cable from the primary port to the secondary. > > This works fine in CentOS 5: DHCP comes up and takes over, giving us the access we need to fix/configure the static IP on the primary port. > > What happens in CentOS 7 depends on whether you plug in one cable or two: > > 1. If you plug in only one cable, NetworkManager sees that the static interface is unplugged, so it *helpfully* moves that IP to the secondary NIC, apparently on the assumption that static is always better than DHCP. This is of no use to us, since all it does is move the problem to the other NIC. > > 2. If you plug both cables in, both interfaces come up configured as you’d expect, but since both configurations provided a gateway address, you still can’t get out to the Internet since the static one came up first, and it’s pointing at an unreachable box. > > I think all we need to do to fix this is convince NetworkManager not to be clever about moving the static IP to the second NIC. Alas, there is no checkbox in the NM GUI labeled “This is a 4U server, dummy, not a laptop.” > > Anyone know how to convince NM to obey the MAC binding in the ifcfg-* file, to prevent NM from moving the broken static IP info to the second NIC? Have you put NM_CONTROLLED="no" in the ifcfg-eth0 script? > Yes, we know we can still disable NetworkManager and edit network-scripts/ifcfg-* directly. We’d just prefer not to fight the OS. Also, unlike EL6, disabling NM on EL7 breaks the network GUI, which we’ve occasionally found helpful, as when we have a semi-clueful tech at the remote site. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos