On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:32 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Jeremy Hoel wrote: > > We noticed this when installing onto some new Dell R320's.. it might have > > something to do with hardware that the device had that the older kernel > > might not have known about. Nothing seemed wrong and everything seemed > to > > install ok (we would also update the kernel in the install process, so > > that > > probably hid any further problems), but moving to a 6.6 install made the > > silly error message go away. > > > Please don't top post. > > Dumb question: *how* were you installing? Did you have a kickstart of your > very own? If so... could it have wanted eth0, and the installer called it > em1? > > mark > > Kickstart.. and we had already changed the interface to the new name. It's the same kickstart between the two versions, with just the nic name being different.