Personally, I am agnostic. I've just read thru Centos documentation that there is a big effort to remove all upstream personalities from Centos. Personally, I don't see why RH is doing this. I would think that it undermines RH. But I'm still new/old to all of this. It used to be the big argument was between Unix from Berkeley(4.? I think) and SysIII/V. Always always battles for turf. Clayton >-----Original Message----- >From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On >Behalf Of Digimer >Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2014 6:34 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: Re: [CentOS] How serious are we about not wanting to see... > >I don't see the concern. CentOS is a binary-compatible clone of Red Hat >Enterprise Linux. Further, Red Hat sponsors and supports the CentOS >project, providing confidence in it's long-term survival which business >looking for a flavour linux want to see. > >CentOS users should be happy about Red Hat, not scared of it. Likewise, >CentOS is valuable to Red Hat as it's the source of their future >customers. So it's a very mutually beneficial relationship. > >digimer > >On 14/12/14 09:29 PM, Clayton Kirkwood wrote: >> Redhat in centos? I type help and the first line says redhat. Are we >> paranoid about red..t? >> >> >> >> Clayton >> >> >> >> >> >> You can tell the caliber of a man by his gun--c. kirkwood >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > > >-- >Digimer >Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer >is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS at centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos