What possible reason could they have for that? On 30/12/14 02:17 AM, Laurent Dumont wrote: > By any change, is it a VPS? I know that my CloudAtCost (very cheap but > extremely unreliable provider) prevents you from using SeLinux on their > Centos image. > > On 12/29/2014 9:58 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: >> Hey guys, >> >> For some reason I can't seem to enable SELinux on this one host. >> >> Here's my SELinux config file: >> >> [root at beta-new:~] #cat /etc/sysconfig/selinux >> >> # This file controls the state of SELinux on the system. >> # SELINUX= can take one of these three values: >> # enforcing - SELinux security policy is enforced. >> # permissive - SELinux prints warnings instead of enforcing. >> # disabled - No SELinux policy is loaded. >> SELINUX=enforcing >> # SELINUXTYPE= can take one of these two values: >> # targeted - Targeted processes are protected, >> # mls - Multi Level Security protection. >> SELINUXTYPE=targeted >> >> >> And when I check if it's enabled this is what I get: >> >> [root at beta-new:~] #getenforce >> Disabled >> >> But when I go to set SELinux to enabled, even with the config file set as >> you see it above, I get this result: >> >> [root at beta-new:~] #setenforce 1 >> setenforce: SELinux is disabled >> >> And nothing I can do enables it on this host. So how, can I solve this >> problem? I would definitely appreciate any advice you may have. >> >> Thanks >> Tim >> > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education?