Op 26-11-14 om 09:27 schreef Johan Vermeulen: > > Op 25-11-14 om 19:08 schreef Tris Hoar: >> On 25/11/2014 16:52, Johan Vermeulen wrote: >>> Hello All, >>> >>> I'm looking at setting up ds-389 on both Centos6.6 en Centos7, both >>> minimal installs with >>> epel repo enabled. >>> >>> When running yum search ds-389 on Centos7 I get only 3 packages, >>> >>> 389-ds-base >>> 389-ds-base-devel >>> 389-ds-base-libs >>> >>> On Centos6.6 I get the whole list: >>> >>> 389-ds.noarch : 389 Directory, Administration, and Console Suite >>> 389-ds-base.x86_64 : 389 Directory Server (base) >>> 389-ds-base-devel.i686 : Development libraries for 389 Directory Server >>> 389-ds-base-devel.x86_64 : Development libraries for 389 Directory >>> Server >>> 389-ds-base-libs.i686 : Core libraries for 389 Directory Server >>> 389-ds-base-libs.x86_64 : Core libraries for 389 Directory Server >>> 389-ds-console.noarch : 389 Directory Server Management Console >>> 389-ds-console-doc.noarch : Web docs for 389 Directory Server >>> Management >>> Console >>> 389-dsgw.x86_64 : 389 Directory Server Gateway (dsgw) >>> >>> Is this a change in policy? >>> >>> I apologise if this has been answered before. >>> A quick google did not provide an answer. >>> >>> Greetings, Johan >>> >> >> Half the those packages are for i686 which is not longer a supported >> architecture in 7, and many of the others are from epel >> >> 389-ds-base.x86_64 1.2.11.15-48.el6_6 rhel-x86_64-server-6 >> 389-ds-base-devel.x86_64 1.2.11.15-48.el6_6 >> rhel-x86_64-server-optional-6 >> 389-ds-base-libs.x86_64 1.2.11.15-48.el6_6 rhel-x86_64-server-6 >> >> Is what I see on one of my RHEL6 servers. >> >> Tris >> >> >> ************************************************************* >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential >> and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom >> they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please >> notify postmaster at bgfl.org >> >> The views expressed within this email are those of the individual, >> and not necessarily those of the organisation >> ************************************************************* >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Hello Tris, > > thanks for the reply. You are right, some of the packages are i686, > logically they are nog in Centos7. > But I have epel enabled on the Centos7 box and I am not seeing > > 389-admin.x86_64 : 389 Administration Server (admin) > 389-admin-console.noarch : 389 Admin Server Management Console > > The setup works without 389-admin as far as I can see on a first test, > but launching > the console is difficult without 389-admin-console. > > Greetings, Johan I found the answer here: https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47865 Looks like the other 389-ds packages are due for Centos7.1. Greetings, J.