On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 09:56 +0000, Ron Yorston wrote: > Phil Wyett <philwyett at aura-tech-systems.co.uk> wrote: > >Could you be more specific about your issue? Does the webcam get > >detected? if you use 'cheese' do you get any errors in say 'dmesg'? > > > >There has been a webcam issue of late that seems to trace back to a > >regression with the latest kernels. This was fixed in the centos plus > >kernel, but there is a wait to see what Red Hat will do. This is a > >kernel issue and all kernel bugs are locked from public view bar Red Hat > >people and the reporter. > > > >Issue seen and fixed in plus kernel: > > > >http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7815 > > I know all that: it was covered in the thread last month, where I > promised to report any progress on the Red Hat bug. > > I didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition. > > Ron If you want progress/info from the Red Hat side, you could always email the assignee on your bug report and see if that gets a response. Regards Phil -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20141212/0ccd3744/attachment-0004.sig>