On 02/06/2014 03:08 PM, Cliff Pratt wrote: > Rejy, for the record, I've downloaded many ISOs and other large files using > my browser (Chrome) for many years. While years ago it was problematic to > use the browser to download large files, it seems to me that that is not so > these days. Of course if you have a very slow or bad connection, it may not > work, and this is where download tools come into their own. But I think > that for most people, browsers will work OK. The real advantage of the > download tools is that a transfer is usually restartable and that is not > always possible with a browser download. Cliff, I have recently faced checksum issue (i.e. checksum didn't match) when I had downloaded the ISO using browser (Firefox). I would say my internet connection is fairly good. After I faced issue with browser, "wget" worked fine for me. -Lala > Cheers, > > Cliff > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Rejy M Cyriac <rcyriac at redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 02/06/2014 01:11 PM, dOminic wrote: >>> Since you are writing the DVD in Windows OS, I assume you don't have any >>> Linux boxes !. >>> I am not sure what are the checksum verify utilities will work perfectly >> in >>> Windows . However, from a quick internet search, I could find an official >>> tool from Windows - >>> http://www.microsoft.com/en-in/download/details.aspx?id=11533 - which >>> supports MD5 ans SHA1 . Please match the MD5 of your downloaded CentOS >> DVD >>> with http://mirror.nbrc.ac.in/centos/6.5/isos/x86_64/md5sum.txt . >>> >>> Hope that helps . >>> >> If you can find a Linux box, get to command line >> >> sha256sum <ISO file> >> >> compare output with provided hash >> >> if they match, burn the dvd with the following command >> >> cdrecord -v -sao <ISO file> >> >> If the hash values do not match, download the ISO again, preferably >> using a download tool. It is better not to use the browser to download >> big files like the ISO, >> >> - rejy (rmc) >> >>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Hal Wigoda <hal.wigoda at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>>> I did not check the hash values. >>>> >>>> How do you do that? >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPad >>>> >>>>> On Feb 6, 2014, at 12:09 AM, Darr247 <darr247 at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 06 February 2014 @ 03:42 zulu, Hal Wigoda wrote: >>>>>> I downloaded the CentOS-6.5-x86_64-bin-DVD1.iso >>>>>> and CentOS-6.5-x86_64-bin-DVD12.iso >>>>>> and tried to burn them to a DVD but both Windows 7 and IOS >>>>>> ( MacBook Pro ) do not recognize these as valid isos. >>>>>> >>>>>> What am I doing wrong? >>>>> What are their hashes? >>>>> Here are some hash values of the files I'm sharing in a bittorrent >>>> client: >>>>> CentOS-6.5-x86_64-bin-DVD1.iso (4,467,982,336 bytes) >>>>> MD5 - 83221db52687c7b857e65bfe60787838 >>>>> SHA1 - 32c7695b97f7dcd1f59a77a71f64f2957dddf738 >>>>> SHA256 - >> c796ab378319393f47b29acd8ceaf21e1f48439570657945226db61702a4a2a1 >>>>> CentOS-6.5-x86_64-bin-DVD2.iso (1,284,395,008 bytes) >>>>> MD5 - 91018b86ca338360bc1212f06ea1719f >>>>> SHA1 - 25e5de362ba6c75d793dbeb060b27ba1865cb5df >>>>> SHA256 - >> afd2fc37e1597c64b3c3464083c0022f436757085d9916350fb8310467123f77 >>>>> There are currently over 1000 other people sharing the >>>>> CentOS-6.5-x86_64-bin-DVD1to2.torrent, too. >>>>> So, do the hashes of your files match those? >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> CentOS mailing list >>>>> CentOS at centos.org >>>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> CentOS mailing list >>>> CentOS at centos.org >>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CentOS mailing list >>> CentOS at centos.org >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos