Am 06.02.2014 um 17:41 schrieb "Phelps, Matt" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu>: > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Fabian Arrotin > <fabian.arrotin at arrfab.net>wrote: > >> On 06/02/14 16:26, Phelps, Matt wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >> http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.ca/2014/02/stable-channel-update.html >>> >>> >>> Yes, please. Can the CentOS folks check with their newly minted Red Hat >>> brethren on this issue? >>> >>> This is getting critical for us. We have over a hundred CO6 desktops that >>> are currently running an insecure version of chromium. The security >> people >>> are all over us on this! >>> >>> We need to run chrome/chromium in order to manage our Google Apps for >>> Government deployment (for over 1000 users). It doesn't work right with >>> firefox. >>> >>> If we need to apply pressure elsewhere, please let us know where to >> direct >>> our fury. >>> >> >> ... to Google ? (especially because it's *their* browser to support >> *their* Google Apps ....) >> >> > Of course we already have notified Google. > > I was hoping for a little more granularity. Google is a large place; as is > Red Hat I know. There was word that Red Hat was working with Google on a > solution, and I was hoping to hear if there was any movement. > > I can't ask Red Hat since we don't pay for it, but perhaps the new CentOS > relationship with them can offer a channel of communication for the Community. i do not understand, having such infrastructure and not even a subscription. CentOS lives also because professionals pay upstream for their work. -- LF