On 02/11/2014 04:08 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, g wrote: > >> On 02/11/2014 12:34 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote: >> <> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014, g wrote: > >>> Now that I look again, that appears to be the case. >>> Not only that, the radiator is tilted so that >>> only the right front corner is close to the board. >> >> (BWG) >> >> i notice that also. >> >>> That area of the board is empty except for a UPC sticker. >> >> who said we who engineer do not know how to think? ;-) > > Not I. > >> you would be very surprised at just how much time is spent >> in trying to "tear down" a new system design. heat sinking >> is an on going challenge. > > No, I wouldn't. > > What surprises me is that its current mechanical > arrangement corresponds to its orignal design. > To me, the radiator seemed to have fallen down. > For all I knew, it might have been held up by persuasion. lol. i can understand. that or a good threat. ;-) from what all you are becoming aware of, w/ lm_sensors running, i would slap a "good to go" label on card and "enjoy the view". -- peace out. in a world with out fences, who needs gates. tc.hago. g .