I should read right to the bottom, shouldn't I? Sigh! On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Cliff Pratt <enkiduonthenet at gmail.com>wrote: > No. 0.98-2 is a patched version of 0.98. A patched version of 0.98.1 would > be eg 0.98.1-3. > > Cheers, > > Cliff > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach <jobst at barrett.com.au>wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:20:05PM -0600, Johnny Hughes ( >> johnny at centos.org) wrote: >> > On 02/19/2014 08:29 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: >> > > >> > > Hi. >> > > >> > > I posted this on the clamav list as well, as I do not know whether >> this is a rpm issue or clamav issue. >> > > Strange problem indeed: >> > > >> > > [root /tmp] #>yum list installed "clamav*" >> > > Loaded plugins: fastestmirror >> > > Installed Packages >> > > clamav.x86_64 0.98-2.el5.rf >> installed >> > > clamav-db.x86_64 0.98-2.el5.rf >> installed >> > > clamav-milter.x86_64 0.98-2.el5.rf >> installed >> > > [root /tmp] #> >> > >> > Yes, repoforge needs to build the new version if clamav (version 0.98.1) >> > instead of 0.98. >> > >> >> But according to the RPM numbers (see above) it already did ... this is >> why it is so confusing. >> >> Jobst >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > >