[CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

Thu Feb 6 16:12:32 UTC 2014
Fabian Arrotin <fabian.arrotin at arrfab.net>

On 06/02/14 16:26, Phelps, Matt wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> wrote:
>> new potential remote code exploit in Chromium flash.
>> http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.ca/2014/02/stable-channel-update.html
>> Doesn't look like these repos are being updated.
>> http://people.redhat.com/tpopela/rpms/
>> http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/
>> Any info on this issue would be welcome.
> Yes, please. Can the CentOS folks check with their newly minted Red Hat
> brethren on this issue?
> This is getting critical for us. We have over a hundred CO6 desktops that
> are currently running an insecure version of chromium. The security people
> are all over us on this!
> We need to run chrome/chromium in order to manage our Google Apps for
> Government deployment (for over 1000 users). It doesn't work right with
> firefox.
> If we need to apply pressure elsewhere, please let us know where to direct
> our fury.

... to Google ? (especially because it's *their* browser to support
*their* Google Apps ....)

Fabian Arrotin
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab