On 02/19/2014 09:53 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:20:05PM -0600, Johnny Hughes (johnny at centos.org) wrote: >> On 02/19/2014 08:29 PM, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >>> I posted this on the clamav list as well, as I do not know whether this is a rpm issue or clamav issue. >>> Strange problem indeed: >>> >>> [root /tmp] #>yum list installed "clamav*" >>> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror >>> Installed Packages >>> clamav.x86_64 0.98-2.el5.rf installed >>> clamav-db.x86_64 0.98-2.el5.rf installed >>> clamav-milter.x86_64 0.98-2.el5.rf installed >>> [root /tmp] #> >> Yes, repoforge needs to build the new version if clamav (version 0.98.1) >> instead of 0.98. >> > But according to the RPM numbers (see above) it already did ... this is why it is so confusing. > > Jobst > No, they didn't ... they built 0.98-2 ... that is their 2nd build of 0.98 If they built the new version it would be: 0.98.1-1 or 0.98.1-2 ... not 0.98-2 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20140220/be9f871e/attachment-0004.sig>