On 01/12/2014 06:01 PM, Darod Zyree wrote: > On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 11:47 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote: >> Hi, >> >> How about using rpm to see what extra packages are installed then we may be >> able to work out why. >> >> Perform a Manual install and save the result of rpm -qa | sort, then run >> your KickStart based installed and run the same command. A diff between >> the two results should show whats extra packages are being installed. :) >> >> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Darod Zyree <darodzyree at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 2014-01-12 at 22:20 +0000, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>>> On 01/12/2014 10:10 PM, Darod Zyree wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Does anyone know why an Anaconda Kickstart installation deploys more >>> rpm >>>>> packages than a manual "basic" installation? >>>>> >>>>> In both cases the following package groups were installed/used >>> according >>>>> to anaconda-ks.cfg in root home directory: @core, @server-policy, >>>>> @workstation-policy >>>> >>>> what ones are more or which ones are missing ? >>>> >>>> also compare the anaconda-ks.cfg left behind on both attempts, are you >>>> sure the %packages section looks identical ? >>>> >>> My kickstart installation does 397 RPM packages. >>> A manual installation does 217 RPM packages. >>> >>> My kickstart installation uses only an OS repository; no updates, epel >>> or anything like that for this test. >>> >>> This repository was created using rsync and centos 6.5 iso. >>> >>> Kickstart package list: >>> %packages >>> @core >>> @server-policy >>> @workstation-policy >>> >>> Which is the same as choosing the "minimal" installation type during >>> manual anaconda as shown in the /root/anaconda-ks.cfg file after the >>> manual installation is completed. >>> > > see attachment diff The mail list does not accept attachments. You must either paste the content into the email or post the file to drop box or some similar service. -- _ °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registered Linux user No #267004 https://linuxcounter.net/ ****