On 01/18/2014 11:09 PM, David Carollo wrote: > Red sleeve is an ARM port. > http://www.redsleeve.org Home page is static from back in '12, but I see mailing list has some activity. I have a pogoplug that has f18 port on it, I will see if I can get redsleeve on it. But won't be for a couple weeks. > On Jan 18, 2014 3:28 PM, "Les Mikesell" <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: >>> Complicated is a good word... >>> >>>> But, the bigger question is where it leaves us if >>>> they just decide to quit after assimilating most of the related >>>> systems under a build ecosystem that no one else can reproduce easily. >>>> >>> There is no secret sauce to the buildsystem. It's not like we're >>> converting TRS-80 Model II TRSDOS files to LS-DOS or anything here, >>> where things aren't well-documented or completely undocumented. >> Hey, I could have done that with my eyes closed and in z80 code. But >> those were simpler times. >> >>> I have reproduced to an extent the buildsystem for CentOS 5 on IA64, and >>> with a little nudging in the right direction by some folks I was able to >>> figure it out. The hard part, as as been said I don't know how many >>> times, is getting the x.0's first tree's dependency tree and build >>> sequence correct with the buildroot populated with a good starter set of >>> packages (and this is very well documented in the Fedora documentation). >>> >>> Anyway, the current work with seven.centos.org is a really good start. >> I hope someone manages an ARM build eventually. It would be fun to >> play with cheap hardware and reliable code. >> >> -- >> Les Mikesell >> lesmikesell at gmail.com >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS at centos.org >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >