centos-bounces at centos.org schrieb am 28.01.2014 14:56:53: > Von: Sorin Srbu <Sorin.Srbu at orgfarm.uu.se> > An: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> > Datum: 28.01.2014 14:57 > Betreff: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not? > Gesendet von: centos-bounces at centos.org > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > > Behalf Of Logan McNaughton > > Sent: den 28 januari 2014 14:33 > > To: CentOS mailing list > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not? > > > > Where I work we use NIS + Kerberos (Active Directory). We have about 150 > > machines at our site. It works quite well, as someone said, the big draw > > back to NIS is that it sends passwords insecurely, but if you use Kerberos > > for authentication it's really quite easy to manage. > > We do have Active Directory as well, but only for the Windows clients. > > But I'd rather keep them separated. > > Kerberos on linux. Is that a pain or a bigger pain? > Whenever I've worked with Kerberos on Windows I've come out all sweaty > afterwards... 8-S > > -- > //Sorin > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi Sorin, we're using ldap with kerberos connected to Active Directoy on our squid proxy with success. And a few Linux-Admins are working (with their Windows User name and Password) with Kerberos connected to Active Directoy on their workstations. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards Andreas Reschke