[CentOS] RHEL Load Balancer Add-on vs KeepAlived
Dimitar Georgievski
mitkany at gmail.comThu Jan 2 00:13:19 UTC 2014
- Previous message: [CentOS] I want to ask about some Kernel level operations.
- Next message: [CentOS] Simple question on USB flash drive naming
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello, I've started reviewing HA solution for HAProxy and trying to decide between RHEL HA Add-on and KeeAlived. Just curious if anyone had a chance to use any of these technologies in a production environment? I would love to learn what your experience with these technologies is in terms of management, scaling, troubleshooting, and monitoring. I am leaning towards RHEL Add-on at the moment because a better documentation, simpler architecture, set-up and management. This project also appears to me to be more active compared to KeepAlived, but I might be wrong. Thanks, Dimitar
- Previous message: [CentOS] I want to ask about some Kernel level operations.
- Next message: [CentOS] Simple question on USB flash drive naming
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list