[CentOS] Antwort: Re: NIS or not?

[Andreas Reschke]

centos-bounces at centos.org schrieb am 28.01.2014 14:56:53:

> Von: Sorin Srbu <Sorin.Srbu at orgfarm.uu.se>
> An: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
> Datum: 28.01.2014 14:57
> Betreff: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
> Gesendet von: centos-bounces at centos.org
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On
> > Behalf Of Logan McNaughton
> > Sent: den 28 januari 2014 14:33
> > To: CentOS mailing list
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
> > 
> > Where I work we use NIS + Kerberos (Active Directory). We have about 
150
> > machines at our site. It works quite well, as someone said, the big 
draw
> > back to NIS is that it sends passwords insecurely, but if you use 
Kerberos
> > for authentication it's really quite easy to manage.
> 
> We do have Active Directory as well, but only for the Windows clients.
> 
> But I'd rather keep them separated.
> 
> Kerberos on linux. Is that a pain or a bigger pain?
> Whenever I've worked with Kerberos on Windows I've come out all sweaty
> afterwards... 8-S
> 
> --
> //Sorin
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Hi Sorin,
we're using ldap with kerberos connected to Active Directoy on our squid 
proxy with success. And a few Linux-Admins are working (with their Windows 
User name and Password) with Kerberos connected to Active Directoy on 
their workstations.



Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards

Andreas Reschke