Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/07/2014 06:47 PM, Always Learning wrote: >> Reading about systemd, it seems it is not well liked and reminiscent of >> Microsoft's "put everything into the Windows Registry" (Win 95 onwards). >> >> Is there a practical alternative to omnipresent, or invasive, systemd ? >> > > The answer to this is no, replacing systemd with something else is just > way to invasive. > > Since new versions of CentOS, Ubuntu, Debian, RHEL, Fedora, OpenSUSE, > Arch, Mageia and other Linux distros are all switching to systemd as the > default .. I would suggest that learning how to use it is going to be > the way to go. I just hope that the distribution of implementing systemd are not so shortsighted (or rather pushing force) as Fedora/RHEL and besides him also offer other alternative (OpenRC is IMO very good candidate, although with sysvinit and upstart I was also satisfied - both did _reliably_ their jobs). Franta Hanzlik