On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:38 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Steve Clark wrote: > > On 07/14/2014 11:26 AM, William Woods wrote: > >> On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:19 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > >>> William Woods wrote: > >>> > >>> Please stop top posting. > >>>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > >>>>> William Woods wrote: > >>>>>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning <centos at u62.u22.net> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 06:42 -0400, Steve Clark wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Having been working with UNIX like systems since 1985 > >>>>>>>> my biggest complaint with systemd is it so intrusive, it wants to > >>>>>>>> be everything which makes it vulnerable to bugs and exploits - > >>>>>>>> umm.. like Windoze! > >>>>>>>> My $.02 > >>>>>>> + $ 10.00 :-) > >>>>>> Because UNIX has never had a bug or exploit right ? > >>>>>> > >>>>> Well... we know that > 50% of the Web and 'Net runs on Linux and > >>>>> other unices. Compare and contrast the number of Windows Server > >>>>> vulnerabilities that have been exploited to those of *Nix... and, > >>>>> for extra credit, how fast they were admitted, and fixed..... > >>>>> > >>>> Like OpenSSL ? > >>> I suggest you google with the following search criteria: "windows > >>> server" exploits > >>> > >> Sigh, nothing like a zealot. ALL OS's have vulns and exploits, no matter > >> what you decide to believe. > >> > > Sigh, nothing like someone who is in a constant state of deniability. > > > Replying to this, because I saw a reply from him, but there was no new > content, for some reason. > > Anyway, he also seems determined to see it all as black and white, rather > than looking at the *much* larger set of bugs and vulnerabilities that > Windows Server has had than any version of 'Nix. Sure, we have some... but > a *lot* fewer, and overwhelmingly far less serious. > > mark > > Yup, overwhelmingly less serious. http://heartbleed.com/ Oh, wait. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >