[CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

[Lamar Owen]

On 07/09/2014 01:31 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I'm not convinced that being open and receptive to changes from people 
> that aren't using and appear to not even like the existing, working 
> system is better than having a single community, all running the same 
> system because they already like it, and focusing on improving it 
> while keeping things they like and are currently using. 

I think you and I remember a different set of lists.  I remember lots of 
griping about changes being forced down throats.  Heh, a quick perusal 
of one of the lists' archives just a minute ago confirmed my recollection.

> With the latter approach, there was a much better sense of the cost of 
> breaking things that previously worked. 
Do you remember the brouhaha over libc5 that 'just worked' versus the 
'changed for no reason' glibc2?  And don't get me started on the 
recollections over the GNOME 1 to 2 upgrade (or fvwm to GNOME, for that 
matter!), or the various KDE upgrades (and the entire lack of KDE for 
RHL 5.x due to the odd license for Qt, remember?  Mandrake got its start 
being essentially RHL with KDE.... and of course the 'stripping' of KDE 
to 'cripple it down the GNOME level' (otherwise known as the 'Red Hat 
Desktop')) or the various kernel uprevs (2.4 broke my whatzit2000 that 
nobody else has!  You CAN'T upgrade!!!!!).  And then there was gcc 2.96. 
(I can feel the tremor in the Source just mentioning that....) And then 
all the i18n changes for 8.0 (I dealt with that one directly, since the 
PostgreSQL ANSI C default had to be changed to whatever was now 
localized.... too bad the Redneck install language has gone away.) And 
then there was the weed called Kudzu.  The bad rep for x.0 releases 
started somewhere, remember?  (Smooge was there, too, and has an 
extensive page about the differences (this link is from my bookmarks and 
memory; AFAIK it still works): 
http://www.smoogespace.com/documents/behind_the_names.html ).

And I'm still waiting for my upgrade to Red Baron. ;-), in case you 
needed it....

Sorry Les, but I was there, and I have the e-mails.  I guess people 
prefer being able to just gripe without the chance for real 
responsibility versus now having a bit of responsibility to help since 
the ability to actually do something about it is available.

Not that I necessarily disagree with your observations, by the way. I'm 
just looking at the brushstrokes of the really big picture and 
remembering how at the time it seemed like we sometimes were just moving 
from one kluge to another (if you insist on the alternate spelling 
'kludge' feel free to use it.....).  But it was a blast being there and 
watching this thing called Linux find its wings, no?

It is still a blast for me, even if I actually do serious work with 
several versions of Linux.  And I'm looking forward to spending some 
quality time with systemd, of which I know very little, and seeing how I 
can make this new tool, which apparently a lot of really smart people 
think is a great idea, work for me (and I may find that I despise it; 
time will tell).  I kind of feel like I've been given a new tool set 
with tools I've never seen, and finding out that a screwdriver and a 
chisel can actually be separate things!  Or finding out what a 'fence 
wire' tool can *really* be used for..... ( see: 
http://www.garrettwade.com/images/330/66A0204.jpg )

And I have two previous versions of CentOS to fall back on while I learn 
the new tools; I have both C5 and C6 in production, and have plenty of 
time in which to do a proper analysis on the best way ('best way' of 
course being subjective; there is no such thing as an entirely objective 
'best way') for me to leverage the new tools. The fact of the matter is 
that Red Hat would not bet the farm on systemd without substantial 
buy-in from a large number of people. The further fact the Debian and 
others have come to the same conclusion speaks volumes, whether any 
given person thinks it stupid or not. And I don't have enough data to 
know whether it's going to work for me or not; I'm definitely not going 
to knee-jerk about it, though.

But the rumors of something 'killing' Linux have and will always be 
exaggerated.  Systemd certainly isn't going to, if gcc 2.96 didn't. I 
mean, think about it: the first rev out of gcc 2.96 wouldn't even 
compile the Linux kernel, IIRC!