[CentOS] Some thoughts on systemd
Always Learning
centos at u62.u22.netSat Jul 19 18:39:48 UTC 2014
- Previous message: [CentOS] Some thoughts on systemd
- Next message: [CentOS] Some thoughts on systemd
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, 2014-07-19 at 11:10 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/19/2014 09:05 AM, Always Learning wrote: > > 4. Lack of knowledge about the replacement. > Well .. all of that may be true and systemd may be the devil ... but we > would still have it as CentOS-7 rebuilds RHEL-7 sources. Debating > whether or not systemd is a good idea is not relevant for CentOS. It is > upstream, it is default, therefore it will be installed. That's just > how it is. I favour the increased knowledge of what it does and how to use it. Surely that is what the Centos Wiki is for ? -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. Centos, Exim, Apache, Libre Office. Linux is the future. Micro$oft is the past.
- Previous message: [CentOS] Some thoughts on systemd
- Next message: [CentOS] Some thoughts on systemd
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list