[CentOS] Cemtos 7 : Systemd alternatives ?

Mon Jul 14 16:22:02 UTC 2014
William Woods <woods.w at gmail.com>

On Jul 14, 2014, at 11:19 AM, Andrew Wyatt <andrew at fuduntu.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:19 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:
> 
>> William Woods wrote:
>> 
>> Please stop top posting.
>>> 
>>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
>>>> William Woods wrote:
>>>>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning <centos at u62.u22.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 06:42 -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Having been working with UNIX like systems since 1985
>>>>>>> my biggest complaint with systemd is it so intrusive, it wants to be
>>>>>>> everything which makes
>>>>>>> it vulnerable to bugs and exploits - umm.. like Windoze!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> My $.02
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> + $ 10.00 :-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Because UNIX has never had a bug or exploit right ?
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Well... we know that > 50% of the Web and 'Net runs on Linux and other
>>>> unices. Compare and contrast the number of Windows Server
>>>> vulnerabilities
>>>> that have been exploited to those of *Nix... and, for extra credit, how
>>>> fast they were admitted, and fixed.....
>>>> 
>> 
>>> Like OpenSSL ?
>> 
>> I suggest you google with the following search criteria: "windows server"
>> exploits
>> 
>>      mark
>> 
> 
> Are you really trying to win the thread with "but omg windows!"?  All
> software is swiss cheese, the only really secure software is turned off.
> Windows is no more or less secure than anything else out there.
> 
> OpenSSL is sadly an excellent example of that.

I was going to bring up OpenSSL but…..yea that.
> 
> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS at centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos