Andrew Wyatt wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:38 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > >> Steve Clark wrote: >> > On 07/14/2014 11:26 AM, William Woods wrote: >> >> On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:19 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> >>> William Woods wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Please stop top posting. >> >>>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 9:48 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> >>>>> William Woods wrote: >> >>>>>> On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Always Learning <centos at u62.u22.net> >> >>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 06:42 -0400, Steve Clark wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Having been working with UNIX like systems since 1985 >> >>>>>>>> my biggest complaint with systemd is it so intrusive, it wants >> to >> >>>>>>>> be everything which makes it vulnerable to bugs and exploits - >> >>>>>>>> umm.. like Windoze! >> >>>>>>>> My $.02 >> >>>>>>> + $ 10.00 :-) >> >>>>>> Because UNIX has never had a bug or exploit right ? >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> Well... we know that > 50% of the Web and 'Net runs on Linux and >> >>>>> other unices. Compare and contrast the number of Windows Server >> >>>>> vulnerabilities that have been exploited to those of *Nix... and, >> >>>>> for extra credit, how fast they were admitted, and fixed..... >> >>>>> >> >>>> Like OpenSSL ? >> >>> I suggest you google with the following search criteria: "windows >> >>> server" exploits >> >>> >> >> Sigh, nothing like a zealot. ALL OS's have vulns and exploits, no >> matter >> >> what you decide to believe. >> >> >> > Sigh, nothing like someone who is in a constant state of deniability. >> > >> Replying to this, because I saw a reply from him, but there was no new >> content, for some reason. >> >> Anyway, he also seems determined to see it all as black and white, >> rather than looking at the *much* larger set of bugs and vulnerabilities that >> Windows Server has had than any version of 'Nix. Sure, we have some... >> but a *lot* fewer, and overwhelmingly far less serious. >> > Yup, overwhelmingly less serious. > > http://heartbleed.com/ > > Oh, wait. This is *pointless*. Point to something *OTHER* than heartbleed. And as this is the CentOS list, please note that 5.x was *not* affected at all. Or does your attention span not go back more than a couple of months? mark, getting annoyed