[CentOS] Thunderbird bug, anyone else have seen it?

[Johnny Hughes]

On 06/15/2014 05:33 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541130
>
> The bug I see is using thunderbird 24.6 which is the latest update on 
> centos 6.5.
> The issue is that every time I open an email with some "+" somewhere in 
> the source (which I didn't traced yet) I get annoying message:
> An error occurred while loading or saving configuration information for 
> thunderbird. Some of your configuration settings may not work properly.
> =In the details section I get:
> Bad key or directory name: 
> "/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/EDH+CAMELLIA/command": `+' is an invalid 
> character in key/directory names
> Bad key or directory name: 
> "/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/EDH+CAMELLIA/command": `+' is an invalid 
> character in key/directory names
> Bad key or directory name: 
> "/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/EDH+aRSA/command": `+' is an invalid 
> character in key/directory names
> Bad key or directory name: 
> "/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/EDH+aRSA/command": `+' is an invalid 
> character in key/directory names
> Bad key or directory name: 
> "/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/EECDH+aRSA+AESGCM/command": `+' is an 
> invalid character in key/directory names
> Bad key or directory name: 
> "/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/EECDH+aRSA+AESGCM/command": `+' is an 
> invalid character in key/directory names
> Bad key or directory name: 
> "/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/EECDH+aRSA+SHA384/command": `+' is an 
> invalid character in key/directory names
> Bad key or directory name: 
> "/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/EECDH+aRSA+SHA384/command": `+' is an 
> invalid character in key/directory names
> Bad key or directory name: 
> "/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/EECDH+aRSA+SHA256/command": `+' is an 
> invalid character in key/directory names
> Bad key or directory name: 
> "/desktop/gnome/url-handlers/EECDH+aRSA+SHA256/command": `+' is an 
> invalid character in key/directory names
> ##end
>
> By the last message of the bug-report I understand that RH released a 
> bug-fix\patch that should help with the issue.
>
> Before I file a bug, anyone else is having the same issue? anyone has 
> the patch from the bug-report

This is defiantly a problem in EL6.  I looked in gvfs and there is no
said fix that I can find.  It seems someone patched it, but it has not
made it into the distro yet.  Red Hat could do that for an individual
customer as part of a support case.  So an upstream bug on the Red Hat
bugzilla could help.




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20140619/321e09c8/attachment.sig>