[CentOS] nodejs, epel, SCL
Jim Perrin
jperrin at centos.orgMon Jun 2 15:37:42 UTC 2014
- Previous message: [CentOS] nodejs, epel, SCL
- Next message: [CentOS] nodejs, epel, SCL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 06/02/2014 10:06 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > There's really a bigger issue of how EPEL is supposed to fit in the > world of 'other' repositories. What should happen when > centosplus/extras has a same-named package? Other 3rd parties? > https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/pdf/FallaciesPoster16x24.pdf I'll let you pick the appropriate one for your argument. Naming is a separate issue that applies to all repos. EPEL isn't special in that regard. It's also not part of the issue here. The problem here is an extraneous Provides that's pulling in the wrong package. -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
- Previous message: [CentOS] nodejs, epel, SCL
- Next message: [CentOS] nodejs, epel, SCL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list