[CentOS] Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?
m.roth at 5-cent.us
m.roth at 5-cent.usThu Mar 20 21:02:06 UTC 2014
- Previous message: [CentOS] Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?
- Next message: [CentOS] Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Matthew Miller wrote: > Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore? And, would you care strongly if it went away (or would you just migrate to something else)? > > I bring this up because we are discussing dropping it from Fedora. This would be far enough in the future that it wouldn't impact RHEL 7, and therefore won't affect anyone here for Quite Some Time*, but here in the new world order of CentOS, I thought it might be useful to check with some actual downstream users. > > What do you think? Do you rely on hosts.allow/hosts.deny a primary security mechanism? As defense-in-depth? Do you have policies which mandate it? > Someone mentioned US gov't - we're a gov't agency (non-DoD), and I just had a quick conversation with my manager. I know I haven't used it in a *bunch* of years; his reaction was, "what's the point", with firewalls, and tools like fail2ban. We're ok if it goes away. mark "awk, on the other hand, you'll get away from me when you pry my cold, dead fingers off the keyboard"
- Previous message: [CentOS] Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?
- Next message: [CentOS] Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list