[CentOS] Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?
m.roth at 5-cent.us
m.roth at 5-cent.usThu Mar 20 21:18:42 UTC 2014
- Previous message: [CentOS] Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?
- Next message: [CentOS] discussioning how software gets obsolete in general [was Re: Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fernando Cassia wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote: > >> Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore? And, >> would you care strongly if it went away (or would you just migrate to >> something else)? > > Please don't remove it. Why this sudden idea in software circles that > stuff that works properly needs to be removed for no reason whatsoever > other than "it's old and we think nobody uses it". How do you know?. IF IT > AIN'T BROKEN, DON'T FIX IT. You might have heard of it. > > Fail2ban is one piece of software which interfaces with tcp wrappers. > v0.9.0 just out > http://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page On the other hand, what justifiable reason was there for the massively increased complexity of grub2? And why do all configuration files suddenly *desperately* need to be xml? mark
- Previous message: [CentOS] Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?
- Next message: [CentOS] discussioning how software gets obsolete in general [was Re: Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list