On Sun, 18 May 2014, Andrew Holway wrote: > Have you looked at parallel filesystems such as Lustre and fhgfs? I have not looked at Lustre, as I have heard many negative things about it (including Oracle ownership). The only business using Lustre where I know the admins has had a lot of trouble with it. No redundancy. Fhgfs looks interesting, and I am planning on looking at it, but have not yet done so. MooseFS and GlusterFS have both been evaluated, and were too slow. In the case of GlusterFS, waaaay too slow. Steve