[CentOS] Large file system idea
Ted Miller
tedlists at sbcglobal.netMon May 19 01:35:21 UTC 2014
- Previous message: [CentOS] Large file system idea
- Next message: [CentOS] Large file system idea
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 05/18/2014 11:47 AM, Steve Thompson wrote: > MooseFS and GlusterFS have both been evaluated, and were too slow. In the > case of GlusterFS, waaaay too slow. How recently have you looked at Gluster? It has seen some significant progress, though small files are still its weakest area. I believe that some use-cases have found that NFS access is faster for small files. Ted Miller Elkhart, IN
- Previous message: [CentOS] Large file system idea
- Next message: [CentOS] Large file system idea
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list