On 11/12/2014 07:19 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net> wrote: >> Once upon a time, Kai Schaetzl <maillists at conactive.com> said: >>> Well, *yes*. It's not business to be carried out on the list nor does the >>> guy who moans about it seem to know why. And if you are the second from >>> Gmail then please move it off-list as well. It's really not anyone's >>> problem on this list what Gmail does. >> >> No, it isn't just "what Gmail does." Yahoo and AOL are other major >> handlers that do the same/similar thing (and there are other >> not-as-major email handlers doing it too). As has happened many times >> in the past, the "rules" for email handling have changed. The biggest >> group of legitimate email handlers affected by this change is mailing >> list handlers; they need to adapt or get blocked/sidelined/etc. >> >> Is it annoying? Yep. Is what these providers are doing a good idea? >> That's debatable. Is it here to stay? Most likely. > > So in practice I think this really boils down to the common problem of > ancient software shipped by RHEL and the bug-for-bug compatibility in > CentOS with the list system eating its own dog food. That is, there > is a fix for mailman, but not in the CentOS version. Sometimes > stability is good, sometimes you need the updates. can you file this at bugs.centos.org please -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc