On 2014/11/14 05:32, Darr247 wrote: > On 14 November 2014 @05:34 zulu, Les Mikesell wrote: >> Just guessing, but it may be that you are using POP to retrieve the >> mail and getting an "uncategorized" view of new messages in the inbox, >> where if you use IMAP (with the possibility of syncing to multiple >> systems), gmail's labels are mapped to imap folders before you get >> them. > > > You may be onto something, because I *am* using IMAP (TB's default > during account setup) instead of POP3. > > I'll be looking around in gmail next to see if there's some way to > pre-sort mail from centos.org (as Miranda implied) before whatever > mail app I'm using at the time fetches it. > I have never seen an online email interface I liked, so I don't spend > much time in gmail's. > > One of the things that drove me to linux (and I liked rpm/yum better > than dpkg/apt) was microsoft disabling Windows Mail in Win7 to force > people to use their online 'Live' email. > I primarily use pop (and imap and gmail interface when I need to), but since I read email with different focus when I'm at home or at work, popping the msgs has turned out to be the most efficient way for me to operate. I also have gmail filters set up. My centos filter is dead simple: Matches: to:(centos at centos.org) Do this: Skip Inbox, Mark as read, Apply label "Lists/centos", Never send it to Spam So in the gmail interface and in the gmail imap setup in TB, I have a nice little cubbyhole that has all the centos emails in it. Then when my TB clients pop the messages, they filter with this one: name="CentOS" enabled="yes" type="17" action="Move to folder" actionValue="mailbox://nobody@Local%20Folders/08%20Lists/CentOS/centos" action="Stop execution" condition="OR (all addresses,contains,centos at centos.org) OR (all addresses,contains,mailman-owner at centos.org)" Interestingly, the filter in my home TB lacks the JunkScore=0 action, but seems to work just as well as the one at work that includes it. Hope this helps. Miranda