The original poster has not replied, so we do not know his reasoning. On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:12 PM, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:04:30PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: >>> >>> Umm, yeah. Encrypted protocols would never be compromised.... >> >> Which do you think is more likely? Someone sniffing a cleartext >> credential set on the wire or someone subverting an alleged "secure" >> encrypted protocol? > > For things that matter, you should expect both. For things that don't > matter, well they don't matter. > Exactly. For instance, what if he needs to use some product whose vendor has never heard of ssh (or company died)? What if he is building a test lab for learning how to use wireshark? Until he comes back and lets us know, we are just farting in the wind. Personally I expect him to know what he is doing > -- > Les Mikesell > lesmikesell at gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos