[CentOS] What List to Use for Patch Requests
Johnny Hughes
johnny at centos.orgTue Nov 4 11:58:07 UTC 2014
- Previous message: [CentOS] What List to Use for Patch Requests
- Next message: [CentOS] What List to Use for Patch Requests
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 11/03/2014 06:38 PM, Stan Cruise wrote: > I posted an issue that may warrant a patch some days ago with no response. > Is there a more appropriate list to post on? CentOS is a rebuild of RHEL Source code ... we don't release bugfixes of things released by RHEL unless we (CentOS team) somehow introduced the broken code with branding updates. Remember, CentOS is supposed to be bug for bug compatible with the upstream products and if we want things fixed they need to come down from upstream. Also, the evolution in CentOS-7 is 3.8.5-22.el7_0.1 ... not evolution 3.10.x. That means that the patch from Fedora 20 will likely not apply as is. If you are sure that it is the same issue then we can open a Red Hat bug and hopefully they will roll in the patch. Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20141104/9303ba1b/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] What List to Use for Patch Requests
- Next message: [CentOS] What List to Use for Patch Requests
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list