Received -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of centos-request at centos.org Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 6:00 AM To: centos at centos.org Subject: CentOS Digest, Vol 118, Issue 20 - Email found in subject Send CentOS mailing list submissions to centos at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-owner at centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 117, Issue 10 (centos-announce-request at centos.org) 2. NTFS-3g from EPEL doesn't work here, older one from PUIAS does (wwp) 3. Re: NTFS-3g from EPEL doesn't work here, older one from PUIAS does (John R. Dennison) 4. Re: NTFS-3g from EPEL doesn't work here, older one from PUIAS does (wwp) 5. Re: Broadcom WiFi Wiki Updated (Ned Slider) 6. New mailserver problems (Robert Moskowitz) 7. Re: Actual complaining: nixspam (G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator) 8. Re: New mailserver problems (Jason Pyeron) 9. Re: Broadcom WiFi Wiki Updated (milos.blazevic) 10. Re: Actual complaining: nixspam (G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator) 11. Re: New mailserver problems (Les Mikesell) 12. Re: New mailserver problems (Robert Moskowitz) 13. Re: New mailserver problems (Les Mikesell) 14. Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works) (Ian Pilcher) 15. Re: Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works) (Frank Cox) 16. CentOS 7 not installable using KVM-over-IP System (Dennis Jacobfeuerborn) 17. Re: Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works) (Ian Pilcher) 18. Re: Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works) (Ned Slider) 19. Re: Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works) (Ian Pilcher) 20. Re: Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works) (Mark LaPierre) 21. Please remove mirrors.skyshe.cn from mirror list,Thanks! (Tom) 22. Re: exercising pam_cracklib from the command line (Elias Persson) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:00:02 +0000 From: centos-announce-request at centos.org To: centos-announce at centos.org Subject: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 117, Issue 10 Message-ID: <mailman.5.1416398402.2599.centos-announce at centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CEEA-2014:1866 CentOS 5 tzdata Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEBA-2014:1868 CentOS 5 device-mapper BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CEBA-2014:1867 CentOS 6 nss-softokn BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 4. CEEA-2014:1866 CentOS 6 tzdata Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes) 5. CEEA-2014:1869 CentOS 6 oracleasm Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes) 6. CESA-2014:1870 Important CentOS 6 libXfont Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 7. CESA-2014:1870 Important CentOS 7 libXfont Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 8. CEEA-2014:1866 CentOS 7 tzdata Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:05:22 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> To: centos-announce at centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2014:1866 CentOS 5 tzdata Enhancement Update Message-ID: <20141118140522.GA17324 at chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1866 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1866.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 13adbf882bc3119c5a28da78246e6cdc76244d871aa22cbe8e123cf011573768 tzdata-2014j-1.el5.i386.rpm d4c91d72a5e00be8e57982a675dec72ae9c42bcc8b425e265704c84cd97220b3 tzdata-java-2014j-1.el5.i386.rpm x86_64: 89c23f9bbba8e12764ba6f99cd3914d4ded95ea0e913034aa87176d7d3f75db0 tzdata-2014j-1.el5.x86_64.rpm ddfaec7c260ada435204baea8ea8839c3549888ec25d53067c933c2eb3bc0d38 tzdata-java-2014j-1.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: 2fc45d4a04df98f734de68ce682d407deb472f02ca79099f57a91847b396043d tzdata-2014j-1.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos at irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:06:20 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> To: centos-announce at centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1868 CentOS 5 device-mapper BugFix Update Message-ID: <20141118140620.GA17425 at chakra.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1868 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1868.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 4cb33df1c0ef17015e9bb009c956cd9f9a535036b4183878015d8150a271a6b9 device-mapper-1.02.67-2.el5_11.1.i386.rpm 386754cd706bebd48282d305000984e6476f40cbba6da3ffe531426666eefad6 device-mapper-event-1.02.67-2.el5_11.1.i386.rpm x86_64: 4cb33df1c0ef17015e9bb009c956cd9f9a535036b4183878015d8150a271a6b9 device-mapper-1.02.67-2.el5_11.1.i386.rpm 3bc114d4788ea74db77c602fbba97626b17ac4ff3c3e8df8cc8377a591e67bb1 device-mapper-1.02.67-2.el5_11.1.x86_64.rpm 6a1b527e304b8e2f4798cca3ca5c382041a407a33d3bb8b986daeae928f612d1 device-mapper-event-1.02.67-2.el5_11.1.x86_64.rpm Source: fa705696164cbf5c7dc693e8d5a8668202568b146ff7ba61ab108346111d23f7 device-mapper-1.02.67-2.el5_11.1.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos at irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:17:08 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> To: centos-announce at centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:1867 CentOS 6 nss-softokn BugFix Update Message-ID: <20141118141708.GA20085 at n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:1867 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-1867.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 305b71ff15dc5ba36ace6b4d1606f0275714f81f29fe814b680d6fae9dbba2fa nss-softokn-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm 40cf10d2757b150e8802e29492f0514edf27da85955faaf3111dd226a82ad3a2 nss-softokn-devel-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm 5926791994ab63650cc72109865685e778bdd4c172b23e19700cd9565a62b9c4 nss-softokn-freebl-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm 339ca1e102362ff6c50dd784a2d782fcf9a99a0534081a68920bec478f88316f nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm x86_64: 305b71ff15dc5ba36ace6b4d1606f0275714f81f29fe814b680d6fae9dbba2fa nss-softokn-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm 0d21406fb8860e671ddae976edefe82c8033a49e1a071df39359f7b042a99f50 nss-softokn-3.14.3-18.el6_6.x86_64.rpm 40cf10d2757b150e8802e29492f0514edf27da85955faaf3111dd226a82ad3a2 nss-softokn-devel-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm d0edcc698681d44e636093ffa108760867e9755713c467370bc5f489684388f7 nss-softokn-devel-3.14.3-18.el6_6.x86_64.rpm 5926791994ab63650cc72109865685e778bdd4c172b23e19700cd9565a62b9c4 nss-softokn-freebl-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm 872ea19cefdbab59fbf10ba536055ab8544ab2c07501169280006874d5bd476a nss-softokn-freebl-3.14.3-18.el6_6.x86_64.rpm 339ca1e102362ff6c50dd784a2d782fcf9a99a0534081a68920bec478f88316f nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.14.3-18.el6_6.i686.rpm eef496abfe4a8d8a44ff47f95ffab070e1ca92200c15e37622f9e08724aea272 nss-softokn-freebl-devel-3.14.3-18.el6_6.x86_64.rpm Source: 41ca911eef52dddb0ba8fbc9fbd847cc2ed3f7aba6f2b7e408427e320996d7ba nss-softokn-3.14.3-18.el6_6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos at irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:17:42 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> To: centos-announce at centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2014:1866 CentOS 6 tzdata Enhancement Update Message-ID: <20141118141742.GA20299 at n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1866 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1866.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 3e20e95f57fa81a1d0781678b01df6847d77f24c9c6c807a37a07c678f269429 tzdata-2014j-1.el6.noarch.rpm 529782b8a983414bc21bd5e8cec0add022d8cbb933ebb54753afe5b2e11ea837 tzdata-java-2014j-1.el6.noarch.rpm x86_64: 3e20e95f57fa81a1d0781678b01df6847d77f24c9c6c807a37a07c678f269429 tzdata-2014j-1.el6.noarch.rpm 529782b8a983414bc21bd5e8cec0add022d8cbb933ebb54753afe5b2e11ea837 tzdata-java-2014j-1.el6.noarch.rpm Source: 01050fef89d203565fee4ed6e0dea67db203df100aac4a6aa77356cea3607790 tzdata-2014j-1.el6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos at irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:18:10 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> To: centos-announce at centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2014:1869 CentOS 6 oracleasm Enhancement Update Message-ID: <20141118141810.GA20456 at n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1869 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1869.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 8e529bd839efa213af7a9d23677fe18f22a0ed2a64234bb48f5eaeae0fbf23d9 kmod-oracleasm-2.0.8-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm Source: f985532fa70023e18280e2ba3ef627e9967652599f9da437c45de1014a134e7e oracleasm-2.0.8-4.el6_6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos at irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:18:34 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> To: centos-announce at centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1870 Important CentOS 6 libXfont Security Update Message-ID: <20141118141834.GA20687 at n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1870 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1870.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 13834a3e7436e041b8455eb295055e10d6eb636d0b63ca52ca923505a46b95ac libXfont-1.4.5-4.el6_6.i686.rpm 17a24810e40317805a3f1d2b4cfb0a320c82dc5a65ce092f7e0c03e8c2a95e1a libXfont-devel-1.4.5-4.el6_6.i686.rpm x86_64: 13834a3e7436e041b8455eb295055e10d6eb636d0b63ca52ca923505a46b95ac libXfont-1.4.5-4.el6_6.i686.rpm fd0ab920b5579b750bf2bd6cf3314a1c967714e80182d169d6fb41bdb363a89a libXfont-1.4.5-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm 17a24810e40317805a3f1d2b4cfb0a320c82dc5a65ce092f7e0c03e8c2a95e1a libXfont-devel-1.4.5-4.el6_6.i686.rpm 669eff421714a4f4eec43261923dbe7fb224dc0c96c5407c63bf16404cce2bbc libXfont-devel-1.4.5-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm Source: 0389c2ba2eb96e97f7c26798356dfbaec9e09aaf9106ab4599e194eadd2182de libXfont-1.4.5-4.el6_6.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos at irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 18:33:30 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> To: centos-announce at centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2014:1870 Important CentOS 7 libXfont Security Update Message-ID: <20141118183330.GA37348 at n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:1870 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-1870.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 4db16b52f6e2005a48f611e2634fe0be85344f8fd63c8df546ac5aa805a146aa libXfont-1.4.7-2.el7_0.i686.rpm 2bea9726aa656252acb5c4bd08b2f8c69faa67e64e138a6eca61d6370876a0ab libXfont-1.4.7-2.el7_0.x86_64.rpm 0fd4d95b96ba54cf9f7a7313c38ece120f83451b169e69c83fd151ffa73ac315 libXfont-devel-1.4.7-2.el7_0.i686.rpm 90931cc19fe4bd908b2ea8265eec983c068743a0ffd2d6982387b1e7122ebac9 libXfont-devel-1.4.7-2.el7_0.x86_64.rpm Source: b96aa205cc865dd7a15ef79606271bf02f57a45be111f9c888ce2169497b9c97 libXfont-1.4.7-2.el7_0.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos at irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 18:37:19 +0000 From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> To: centos-announce at centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2014:1866 CentOS 7 tzdata Enhancement Update Message-ID: <20141118183719.GA37518 at n04.lon1.karan.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2014:1866 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-1866.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 3c2392072374f63df6dcc1fa55adcfc99611803fdf51d55f2946fafa2fe1c1d6 tzdata-2014j-1.el7_0.noarch.rpm 4a54a7598e8390f93212bddcbf918c24c4d37640c841ef96383e01327c5647dc tzdata-java-2014j-1.el7_0.noarch.rpm Source: 52a2463bc19c552d1eee2bdc4d4f0afa93a648406704a1ef951ed1759b385723 tzdata-2014j-1.el7_0.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ } irc: hughesjr, #centos at irc.freenode.net ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce at centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 117, Issue 10 ************************************************ ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:07:50 +0100 From: wwp <subscript at free.fr> To: centos at centos.org Subject: [CentOS] NTFS-3g from EPEL doesn't work here, older one from PUIAS does Message-ID: <20141119130750.48f59145 at anthra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hello there, here on my CentOS 6 (up-to-date), since a recent update of the NTFS modules to ntfs-3g-2014.2.15-6 from EPEL repo, mounting my NTFS partitions simply doesn't work ("NTFS signature is missing"). Back to puias' 2011.4.12-5.puias6 and it works again. Such issue observed on several CentOS systems, while upgrading to 6.6. Did I miss something? I browsed the web and RH's bug tracker but found nothing yet. Regards, -- wwp -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20141119/cbc0fa86/attachment-0001.sig> ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 06:09:35 -0600 From: "John R. Dennison" <jrd at gerdesas.com> To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] NTFS-3g from EPEL doesn't work here, older one from PUIAS does Message-ID: <20141119120935.GG777 at frodo.gerdesas.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:07:50PM +0100, wwp wrote: > > Did I miss something? I browsed the web and RH's bug tracker but found > nothing yet. Perhaps open a ticket in bugzilla against EPEL for that component if one doesn't already exist? John -- Be in charge of your own destiny, or some one else will. -- John Francis "Jack" Welch, Jr. (1935-), past Chairman and CEO of General Electric -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20141119/a55579f8/attachment-0001.sig> ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:25:10 +0100 From: wwp <subscript at free.fr> To: "John R. Dennison" <jrd at gerdesas.com> Cc: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] NTFS-3g from EPEL doesn't work here, older one from PUIAS does Message-ID: <20141119132510.78a22f76 at anthra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hello John, On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 06:09:35 -0600 "John R. Dennison" <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:07:50PM +0100, wwp wrote: > > > > Did I miss something? I browsed the web and RH's bug tracker but found > > nothing yet. > > Perhaps open a ticket in bugzilla against EPEL for that component if one > doesn't already exist? Found it! I'll have to wait for next package update, I guess (ntfs-3g-2014.2.15-7.el6 to come). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164757 Regards, -- wwp -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20141119/7fbe4073/attachment-0001.sig> ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:29:31 +0000 From: Ned Slider <ned at unixmail.co.uk> To: centos at centos.org Cc: Mail list for wiki articles <centos-docs at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Broadcom WiFi Wiki Updated Message-ID: <546C8D2B.2000007 at unixmail.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 19/11/14 11:17, Milos Blazevic wrote: > Hi all, > > > Long time, no speak. Shifting from private sector job to full-time > freelance work took its toll. > As a result, among other things, the Broadcom Wiki page > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless/Broadcom I "maintain" was > neglected, and over the past couple of years I've been receiving e-mail > inquiries about the Wiki and its applicability. > > I'm happy to say and let you all know that the Wiki page has been > updated with instructions for compiling the latest Broadcom driver > with the latest kernel release, and the driver was tested. The current > instructions are applicable to CentOS 6 x86_64, but I'm hoping to expand > that to CentOS 7 as well. > CentOS 5 instructions were removed. Of course, I can post compilation > instructions for 5 also, but it'd be tested on a VM and the driver > module wouldn't actually go through proper testing. Your thoughts on > this matter are certainly welcome. > > The page is still being reviewed/edited by myself and could use > 'polishing', but again, your feedback is always more than welcome and > even desired! > > Hi Milos, Always great to see folks contributing, so thanks for your efforts! Regarding Step 4a: Loading the driver module into kernel: modprobe understands module dependencies and will automatically resolve them whereas insmod does not. Therefore one should probably use modprobe to load the module. You mix the usage of insmod and modprobe in section 4a - for consistency I would stick to modprobe at which point the discussion about manually loading module dependencies becomes irrelevant and could be removed to simplify the section. I've also copied my reply to the centos-docs list. ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 08:36:08 -0500 From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: [CentOS] New mailserver problems Message-ID: <546C9CC8.20509 at htt-consult.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Well, in part we will see if you get this and I get the return. I JUST launched my new mail server after a few miscues. Actually the OS is Redsleeve6, which is the arm port of Centos 6, and perhaps some of my problems may come down to porting problems. But first, it may be that despite my testing, I missed something in the configurations. First clamd problems: Nov 19 08:09:54 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on: /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18598/parts Nov 19 08:10:15 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on: /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts Nov 19 08:11:13 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on: /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18598/parts Nov 19 08:11:35 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on: /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts Nov 19 08:12:33 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on: /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18598/parts Nov 19 08:12:54 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on: /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts Nov 19 08:14:07 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on: /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18598/parts Then amavis problems: 08:08:42 z9m9z amavis[18599]: (18599-05) Checking: dkz-30wwFhmC [85.214.87.163] <u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de> -> <rgm at htt-consult.com> Nov 19 08:08:43 z9m9z amavis[18599]: (18599-05) (!)run_av (ClamAV-clamd) FAILED - unexpected , output="/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts: lstat() failed: Permission denied. ERROR\n" Nov 19 08:08:43 z9m9z amavis[18599]: (18599-05) (!)ClamAV-clamd av-scanner FAILED: CODE(0x29d9e28) unexpected , output="/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts: lstat() failed: Permission denied. ERROR\n" at (eval 100) line 594. Nov 19 08:08:43 z9m9z amavis[18599]: (18599-05) (!!)WARN: all primary virus scanners failed, considering backups But is seems others are working? Anyway, a mailserver change is always painful.... ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:14:57 +0100 From: G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator <goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de> To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Actual complaining: nixspam Message-ID: <546CA5E1.6030304 at filmakademie.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Am 08.10.14 um 23:07 schrieb John R. Dennison: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 05:04:45PM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> >> Well, no: they tell me that they are *billed* for each major incident. > > There is a legal term that applies to this use case: "extortion" AFAIK IX is not billing .... They do a great job for couple of years. The problem might be m.roths provider, if they have a zombi spam system somewhere and dynamic IPs e.g. they can be put on the list. http://www.heise.de/ix/NiX-Spam-DNSBL-and-blacklist-for-download-499637.html If your mail server is affected by our blacklist please ask your internet service provider or your network administrator to shut down the spam source in your network because this is the blacklisting reason. Follow the removal instructions on www.dnsbl.manitu.net if you need to speed up the delisting process. my2cents /G?tz -- G?tz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 82 420 E-Mail goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de Filmakademie Baden-W?rttemberg GmbH Akademiehof 10 71638 Ludwigsburg www.filmakademie.de Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: J?rgen Walter MdL Staatssekret?r im Ministerium f?r Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-W?rttemberg Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Prof. Thomas Schadt ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:57:29 -0500 From: "Jason Pyeron" <jpyeron at pdinc.us> To: "'CentOS mailing list'" <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] New mailserver problems Message-ID: <6AF6C4418ACA408A96818C7C28A337F8 at black> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Moskowitz > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 8:36 > > Well, in part we will see if you get this and I get the return. > > I JUST launched my new mail server after a few miscues. > Actually the OS > is Redsleeve6, which is the arm port of Centos 6, and perhaps Can you reproduce in a VM on normal Centos 6 with the same config files and package names (and versions)? > some of my > problems may come down to porting problems. But first, it > may be that > despite my testing, I missed something in the configurations. > > First clamd problems: > > Nov 19 08:09:54 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on: > /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18598/parts > Nov 19 08:10:15 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on: > /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts > Nov 19 08:11:13 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on: > /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18598/parts > Nov 19 08:11:35 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on: > /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts > Nov 19 08:12:33 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on: > /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18598/parts > Nov 19 08:12:54 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on: > /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts > Nov 19 08:14:07 z9m9z clamd[857]: lstat() failed on: > /var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18598/parts > > Then amavis problems: > > 08:08:42 z9m9z amavis[18599]: (18599-05) Checking: dkz-30wwFhmC > [85.214.87.163] <u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de> -> > <rgm at htt-consult.com> > Nov 19 08:08:43 z9m9z amavis[18599]: (18599-05) (!)run_av > (ClamAV-clamd) > FAILED - unexpected , > output="/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts: > lstat() failed: Permission denied. ERROR\n" > Nov 19 08:08:43 z9m9z amavis[18599]: (18599-05) (!)ClamAV-clamd > av-scanner FAILED: CODE(0x29d9e28) unexpected , > output="/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts: > lstat() failed: Permission denied. ERROR\n" at (eval 100) line 594. > Nov 19 08:08:43 z9m9z amavis[18599]: (18599-05) (!!)WARN: all primary > virus scanners failed, considering backups > > But is seems others are working? > > Anyway, a mailserver change is always painful.... > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:00:56 +0000 From: "milos.blazevic" <milos.blazevic at sbb.rs> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Cc: Mail list for wiki articles <centos-docs at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Broadcom WiFi Wiki Updated Message-ID: <20141119150056.Horde._vgIUo-rFTXA33JWsPLUUw1 at webmail2.sbb.rs> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes Quoting Ned Slider <ned at unixmail.co.uk>: > > Hi Milos, > > Always great to see folks contributing, so thanks for your efforts! > > Regarding Step 4a: Loading the driver module into kernel: > > modprobe understands module dependencies and will automatically resolve > them whereas insmod does not. Therefore one should probably use modprobe > to load the module. > > You mix the usage of insmod and modprobe in section 4a - for consistency > I would stick to modprobe at which point the discussion about manually > loading module dependencies becomes irrelevant and could be removed to > simplify the section. > > I've also copied my reply to the centos-docs list. > Hello Ned, I appreciate your prompt response, and definitely agree with you regarding the insmod part. I was actually thinking of removing that completely from the Wiki and leaving only the modprobe part of the 4a section. In addition, it appears to cause confusion to user who are not very tech/Linux savvy. The only reason why I left it there is because at the time of the original document writing, there were some issues where 'insmod' proved useful. In addition, I just noticed that the boot-time module loading part is obsolete by being applicable to CentOS 5, rather than 6. I'll move on and update that also. Cheers, Milos. ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:23:13 +0100 From: G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator <goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Actual complaining: nixspam Message-ID: <546CB5E1.4010900 at filmakademie.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Am 19.11.14 um 15:31 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us: > G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote: >> Am 08.10.14 um 23:07 schrieb John R. Dennison: >>> On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 05:04:45PM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>> >>>> Well, no: they tell me that they are *billed* for each major incident. >>> >>> There is a legal term that applies to this use case: "extortion" >> >> AFAIK IX is not billing .... They do a great job for couple of years. > > They have NOT been doing a "great job" for many years. Back around 2000 or > 2001, Cogeco in Canada was using them... and they blocked Chicago > Roadrunner, which was *the* ISP for most of the city of Chicago, one of > the three largest cities in the US (competition? what's that?) Right now, > hostmonster, my hosting provider, uses a primary mailserver to send from > their literal millions of domains (I got that figure from their tech > support), and it was hostmonster's tech support that told me they were > paying something like $150 "per incident" to get themselves removed - I > assume this is when nixspam claims they've got too many complaints for me > to remove myself. In ANY large hosting provider, anyone can buy a domain > and start spamming in hours, if not minutes, and I challenge you to show > me a large hosting provider that does not have this problem. > So some tech support tells you something, and you believe him for 100%? Go and get some real prove. > Twenty years ago, when there were thousands of small ISPs, nixspam's > method made sense. With the mergers, and the near-death of small ISPs, > it's an *idiot's* idea. Plus, they don't offer a whitelist, to get one's > self listed, for love or money. If it is such and idiot's idea, why are they still so famous and widely used? > > No, they're assholes, using a methodology that's 15+ years out of date. > And, I'll note, even the CentOS list gets spam, in spite of nixspam. Uh. your rudeness gives an deep insight of your state of mind and your POV. masterstroke to be taken seriously! >> >> The problem might be m.roths provider, if they have a zombi spam system >> somewhere and dynamic IPs e.g. they can be put on the list. > > See above. Perhaps you don't understand the current business model of > large hosting providers, and the reality of what they have to deal with. I know that and a lot of them (still) suck. We hat all over Germany problems couple of years ago with phone companies like eplus and cable tv providers as ISPs getting an RBLs etc. Still web.de, 1&1 and gmx with ++45 millions of mail accounts suck in some ways (currently we are investigating such an issue.) >> >> http://www.heise.de/ix/NiX-Spam-DNSBL-and-blacklist-for-download-499637.html >> >> If your mail server is affected by our blacklist please ask your >> internet service provider or your network administrator to shut down the >> spam source in your network because this is the blacklisting reason. >> Follow the removal instructions on www.dnsbl.manitu.net if you need to >> speed up the delisting process. > > Wait, *YOUR* blacklist? Are you actually affiliated with nixspam? If so, > then add a significant number of curses and insults, because you have *NO* > answer to what I say, above. And, btw, when are you going to block, say, > yahoo's mailservers? //very confused head-shaking// Read all information provided, than start shouting ... if you where interested in a objective discussion and problem solving you would have opened the link and read the text and would have seen that this is a quote. sorry that I forgot to mark and underline and point this out that a .... like you can see this. Over and out. my last2cents on this. /G?tz -- G?tz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 82 420 E-Mail goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de Filmakademie Baden-W?rttemberg GmbH Akademiehof 10 71638 Ludwigsburg www.filmakademie.de Eintragung Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 205016 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: J?rgen Walter MdL Staatssekret?r im Ministerium f?r Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-W?rttemberg Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Prof. Thomas Schadt ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 09:35:04 -0600 From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] New mailserver problems Message-ID: <CAOAgVpzuxBCqhLR5WbV6eZwHW4U_6=S+CTO-Lqi=4eFYTjMcJg at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > output="/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts: lstat() > failed: Permission denied. ERROR\n" Ownership or selinux problem? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com ------------------------------ Message: 12 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:42:30 -0500 From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] New mailserver problems Message-ID: <546CC876.90708 at htt-consult.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed On 11/19/2014 10:35 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: >> output="/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts: lstat() >> failed: Permission denied. ERROR\n" > Ownership or selinux problem? Unfortunately no selinux on RSEL. has to do, in part, with it being a port to armv5, eventhough I run it on armv7. I looked at the permissions and from /var/spool/amavisd it is owned by amavis:amavis ------------------------------ Message: 13 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:12:08 -0600 From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] New mailserver problems Message-ID: <CAOAgVpx0F+24nt-4dsZ4VuYrPB_WwffG0o5UoR9D3QaWLQgusw at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > On 11/19/2014 10:35 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> output="/var/spool/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20141119T075446-18599/parts: >>> lstat() >>> failed: Permission denied. ERROR\n" >> >> Ownership or selinux problem? > > > Unfortunately no selinux on RSEL. has to do, in part, with it being a port > to armv5, eventhough I run it on armv7. > > I looked at the permissions and from /var/spool/amavisd it is owned by > amavis:amavis Without selinux, permission errors are usually pretty straightforward - that is, if something logs a 'permission denied', it means exactly that. I could be anywhere up the path, or the program accessing it might not have the uid you expect, though. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com ------------------------------ Message: 14 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 14:40:55 -0600 From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno at gmail.com> To: centos at centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works) Message-ID: <m4iv8p$cg6$1 at ger.gmane.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I'm creating a simple RPM for my 32-bit CentOS 6 server. When I build the RPM without specifying a target architecture (rpmbuild foo.spec), it successfully builds an i386 RPM. If I try to build an i686 RPM, I get nothing: $ rpmbuild --target i686 foo.spec Building target platforms: i686 Building for target i686 And I'm returned to command prompt with no error message. The SPEC file doesn't contain any architecture-related tags. I feel like I must be missing something really, really basic, but I'll be darned if I can figure out what it might be. Any ideas? -- ======================================================================== Ian Pilcher arequipeno at gmail.com -------- "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship" -------- ======================================================================== ------------------------------ Message: 15 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 14:49:18 -0600 From: Frank Cox <theatre at melvilletheatre.com> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works) Message-ID: <20141119144918.feb19dda869b36b271166abf at melvilletheatre.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 14:40:55 -0600 Ian Pilcher wrote: > I'm creating a simple RPM for my 32-bit CentOS 6 server. When I build > the RPM without specifying a target architecture (rpmbuild foo.spec), it > successfully builds an i386 RPM. export CC="gcc -m32" rpmbuild --target=i686 foo.spec -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com ------------------------------ Message: 16 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 21:51:44 +0100 From: Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <dennisml at conversis.de> To: centos at centos.org Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 7 not installable using KVM-over-IP System Message-ID: <546D02E0.5060209 at conversis.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I just tried to install CentOS 7 using a Lantronix Spider KVM-over-IP System and its virtual media feature and to my surprise this did not work. The installation using the netinstall iso seems to work for a while (I see some dracut boot messages) but when the first stage of the boot is finished I get dropped into an emergency shell with the error message that "/dev/root does not exist". I tried this on a Supermicro system and a gen-8 HP ProLiant Server both with the same result. Using CentOS 6 instead worked fine and I could install the Systems without issues. Any idea what the problem could be? Given that the iso is passed through as a USB storage device I'm not sure what the problem could be. Regards, Dennis ------------------------------ Message: 17 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:34:49 -0600 From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno at gmail.com> To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works) Message-ID: <m4j2dq$ras$1 at ger.gmane.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On 11/19/2014 02:49 PM, Frank Cox wrote: > export CC="gcc -m32" > rpmbuild --target=i686 foo.spec Same result. Building target platforms: i686 Building for target i686 No error message or code. Weird. Weird. Weird. (And I can't escape the feeling that I've seen this before.) -- ======================================================================== Ian Pilcher arequipeno at gmail.com -------- "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship" -------- ======================================================================== ------------------------------ Message: 18 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 22:02:33 +0000 From: Ned Slider <ned at unixmail.co.uk> To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works) Message-ID: <546D1379.3010505 at unixmail.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 19/11/14 20:40, Ian Pilcher wrote: > I'm creating a simple RPM for my 32-bit CentOS 6 server. When I build > the RPM without specifying a target architecture (rpmbuild foo.spec), it > successfully builds an i386 RPM. > > If I try to build an i686 RPM, I get nothing: > > $ rpmbuild --target i686 foo.spec > Building target platforms: i686 > Building for target i686 > > And I'm returned to command prompt with no error message. The SPEC file > doesn't contain any architecture-related tags. > > I feel like I must be missing something really, really basic, but I'll > be darned if I can figure out what it might be. > > Any ideas? > Try running rpmbuild verbosely with -vv and see if that gives you any clues. Can you rebuild other i686 packages? That should tell you if the issue is with your build system or the package in question. Have you ever edited any arch related parameters in ~/.rpmrc? ------------------------------ Message: 19 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:57:06 -0600 From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno at gmail.com> To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works) Message-ID: <m4je93$ah$1 at ger.gmane.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On 11/19/2014 04:02 PM, Ned Slider wrote: > Try running rpmbuild verbosely with -vv and see if that gives you any clues. I just figure it out. I am a moron. When I added "--target i686" to the command line (or "--target i386"), I was omitting the "-bb". rpmbuild wasn't doing anything, because I didn't tell it to do anything. I.e. I was literally typing "rpmbuild --target i686 foo.spec". I'm going to crawl back into my hole now. Please ignore this thread. :-/ -- ======================================================================== Ian Pilcher arequipeno at gmail.com -------- "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship" -------- ======================================================================== ------------------------------ Message: 20 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 21:55:33 -0500 From: Mark LaPierre <marklapier at gmail.com> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works) Message-ID: <546D5825.3080301 at gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On 11/19/14 19:57, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 11/19/2014 04:02 PM, Ned Slider wrote: >> Try running rpmbuild verbosely with -vv and see if that gives you any clues. > > I just figure it out. I am a moron. > > When I added "--target i686" to the command line (or "--target i386"), I > was omitting the "-bb". rpmbuild wasn't doing anything, because I > didn't tell it to do anything. I.e. I was literally typing "rpmbuild > --target i686 foo.spec". > > I'm going to crawl back into my hole now. Please ignore this thread. > > :-/ > Hey Ian, Could you post the successful command line to the mail list, including the -bb, for the benefit of those who might be searching for a solution to the same problem you tripped over. Change the subject to Re: [CentOS] Can't build RPM for i686 target (i386 works)(SOLVED) -- _ ?v? /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registered Linux user No #267004 https://linuxcounter.net/ **** ------------------------------ Message: 21 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 15:58:56 +0800 From: Tom <yanjingtao at gmail.com> To: centos at centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Please remove mirrors.skyshe.cn from mirror list,Thanks! Message-ID: <546D9F40.8020903 at gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Hi, This is a (new?) mirror in China, but I found this mirror hasn't enough bandwidth, I have tested in many server in China, this mirror has a low ping (smaller than 30ms), and a very low download speed(smaller than 10KB/s), so fastestmirror will let it to be the best mirror, but download very slow. I am really happy to see that skyshe.cn is willing to provide this service. However, I don't think their bandwidth is enough to handle this service. Tom ------------------------------ Message: 22 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 10:44:38 +0100 From: Elias Persson <delreich at takeit.se> To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] exercising pam_cracklib from the command line Message-ID: <546DB806.3070906 at takeit.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2014-11-17 20:57, James B. Byrne wrote: > CentOS-6.6 > > Is there any command line program that determines and reports what > pam_cracklib.so returns for a given password; subject to variation > in the command line options and values provided? For example, > assuming a cli driver program called cli_driver_pgm: > > cli_driver_pgm pam_cracklib.so difok=8 minlen=14 dcredit=3 > ucredit=3 lcredit=3 ocredit=3 minclass=2 maxrepeat=3 maxsequence=3 > reject_username gecoscheck -- somepassword > > -> pam_cracklib calculated minlen value for somepassword > > > My Google-fu appears to have deserted me. > Googling for `"pam_cracklib" cli tool` got me a recommendation of `cracklib-check` via superuser [1]. Not sure if that does what you want, but it might be a start? [1]: http://superuser.com/q/441220 - -- AF24 6DE9 D1DF DFB8 3A74 A7AC F457 B7A3 5DF1 4240 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUbbgGAAoJEPRXt6Nd8UJAIpkP/RDLHSlEtaCJrb+oFxr0RP7T 5Tw15ejbEN92uMNC2510zubRhDMwOpMUASyDCa+rijQafTWPc/yxRGBCPWbYLkc3 orEpkN6mHpDgen8T65TDlqDqoTJCkfy+yh1JoLsrETPOGMWx6YyP7NrM+iSdcuie YLUYyrI6nqTNG+T6c0jvoNWfQ0YK6BOxGsBIwl3GRHEq8qWbkcWnr8ImMhkheNTX rr9ssmQuDr52NLWM3MZYUtjcKKKyk6sFQlCW0tE260CfBOTAlMGMIU/5A9NwH9fV TqeubOi3FL5dV9UH09nVqWnDfPnoGMwmuVzPOqFC4YiMxZVSYedxdkFSILFuWfQT eIfn6F5amiR4YbIJ9QDtybDbxO4POhHhEZ2BsiZf50UjQNNTmcmmyQuPHfH1ZCRd iNymLTsUFpW6akAPhFyZsxaxIzV9SgLkwp09pWYTe2POC65jCPuvwE1m/umHSgjc 4Yvo/NV0x27eGZ1nllrxUmR5vwdZNNa/mXskDEQwfkuK01BT1uUnOBZFfnAV89I5 zGryFZLEMVy0ZOgpaTBqwhhLjUxchA7EDfabCPq6VDE8ymOR8upPJowSISKlUaNF 4a2IQEhWZX2lgCgu7c49sYjfFFtqnrBdY9IrhJ8zXnu23ky5uPEkdvA98Ni7xffM 9EfBmb5lRi5X5EHQViNg =WIze -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS at centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos End of CentOS Digest, Vol 118, Issue 20 ***************************************