[CentOS] [OT] mail address - centos mail list

Sun Nov 9 05:59:04 UTC 2014
Keith Keller <kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us>

On 2014-11-09, Stephen Harris <lists at spuddy.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 05:58:53PM -0800, Keith Keller wrote:
>> The fundamental reason is because Mailman is rewriting the headers in an
>> incompatible way.  It is not his site's usage of DKIM.  This is a known
>> issue with Mailman.  (I used to have a good link explaining the issue,
>> but can't find it now; if I find it later I'll post it.)
>
> So we have a 20-year old piece of technology ("mailman") and a modern
> proposal ("DKIM")... and somehow it's mailman's fault.  Uh huh.

Mailman is by my reckoning only about 15 years old, and DKIM has been
around for about a decade.  So I'm not really convinced by your argument
here.

Plus, it's not like the Mailman folks themselves are blaming DKIM.
Here's a page they wrote up.

http://wiki.list.org/display/DEV/DKIM

"Make no mistake though, DKIM cannot be ignored"

I haven't looked very hard, but I haven't found anything authoritative
on Mailman vs. DKIM more recent than 2012 (which itself means they've
been thinking about it for a long time; the wiki doc talks about another
document written in 2009).

> The problem, ultimately, is with senders with a "reject" policy published.
> DKIM is not compatible with internet email today, and so mail from those
> senders _will_ be rejected.

Well, someone's gotta be first, because there's no way we'll get
everyone agree to switch over on a given date.  If Yahoo and Google are
doing it they're forcing the issue sooner rather than later.  I'm not
sure that's a bad thing.

--keith

-- 
kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us