Am 09.10.2014 um 20:11 schrieb John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com>: > On 10/9/2014 11:06 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: >>> >Can anyone provide some insight for me? >>> > >> This would be a perfect use case for ZFS snapshot send and receive! > > Its not perfect if you don't want to lose all database transactions, new files, and email between the last update and the point of hardware failure. > > > drbd really is the best answer as its continuous in-order replication. +1 in conjunction with pacemaker and corosync it would also switch over when some hardware issues appears. -- LF