On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 11:05 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > It is about fundamental approach. We always modularize things: split into > smaller subunits each of the last doing its smaller task. This allows to > make smaller things work reliably, and test these smaller things more > comprehensively. Astonishing ! Its how I do my projects, programming and other work. Do you think our Fedora friends might adopt your revolutionary idea ? > As it is much smaller number of combinations of factors > you need to repeat your test with in case of subunits. People use this > approach for ages. Programs are split into subroutines. Rockets are built > from to awful degree independent modules. We had this "modular" system V > boot until recently. We lost it. We got "iPhone, with whatever you can get > in App store" instead. And not all of us are pleased by this change. And, > BTW, there was one of the posts of MS Windows big fan on this list who > welcomes this change; his post should have made everybody think... Well, one suggestion is we set-up a working group to devise a replacement (or replacements) for systemd. The most difficult task is selecting a nice name for the systemd replacement. No good anyone moaning when only action will bring change. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU.