On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 12:19 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: > On Thu, October 9, 2014 21:11, John R Pierce wrote: > > On 10/9/2014 6:07 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > >> BTW, the whole idea of "antivirus" is flawed. It is based on "enumerate > >> bad". You can't, as one never knows what will be invented in a future. > > > > I agree, but I don't know what else you can put in the hands of the > > novice, unless its the iPhone world of corporate approved apps only > > purchased through a monopoly 'app store'. > > > > Which simply means: Only 'Government Approved' viruses allowed. Excellent point. Windows 95 was designed to be accessible by the USA authorities. USA anti-virus software "allows" access from the USA authorities. Remember M$'s "3 knocks" and you are in Windoze software ? The greater the difference between (Windoze, Lindoze etc.) and Linux the better. I am sure M$ could have designed a much more secure operating system: But it didn't. Hence the success of superior non-Windoze operating systems. Keeping Linux pure from the Windoze influence is essential even if it means upsetting systemd fans :-) -- Regards, Paul. England, EU.